U-turn on how much Albertans will receive makes one wonder

Nobody should be surprised by the Alberta government's U-turn on energy royalties.

The Conservatives have been driving along with their turn-indicator light blinking for the past six months. We knew they were getting ready to turn the wheel; we just didn't know how hard.

So, did Premier Ed Stelmach just pull off a smooth lane change? Or should he be charged with reckless driving?

It all depends on your perspective, on whether you think the government was right to raise royalty rates in the first place a few years ago or should have been hit over the head with a tire iron at the time for meddling with Alberta's economic engine.

I happen to think a bit of both: that the government was right to raise the royalty rates and now deserves to be hit over the head for reversing itself.

Here's why. Call it a tale of two government-sponsored reports.

One, written by academics and business experts, reached this conclusion after holding public hearings in 2007: "Albertans do not receive their fair share from energy development."

The second, written by government and energy executives behind closed doors, was released on Thursday and pretty much reached this conclusion: Alberta energy companies do not receive their fair share from energy development.

The 2007 report -- with the blunt and self-explanatory title, "Our Fair Share" -- not only led the Alberta government to hike royalty rates but also heralded a new transparency in provincial politics where Premier Stelmach kept a promise to make the report public soon after he received it.

This week's report -- with the fuzzy and self-congratulatory title, "Energizing Investment: A Framework to Improve Alberta's Natural Gas and Conventional Oil Competitiveness" -- has led the government to reverse itself, reduce royalty rates and reinforce a return to closed-door politics.

The 2007 report took a long-term view of oil and gas resources, saying that while Albertans deserve a fair share of royalties today, future generations shouldn't be cheated -- even if that means slowing the pace of development somewhat.

The new report takes a much shorter-term view, focusing on immediate results to kick-start more drilling activity and concludes: "The hard truth is that Alberta has lost competitive ground."

It might be a "hard truth" for the government, but it's hard to swallow for the authors of the 2007 report. They argue the government -- as a representative of you, the owner of the resources -- should not have backed down to industry pressure to lower rates.

"If we produce it, get all the revenues and then spend it right away, we're not transforming this asset into a financial asset to kind of ensure that we've got revenue flows down the road," said Andre Plourde, energy economist at the University of Alberta and one of the "Our Fair Share" authors. He has called the government's actions on royalties "shameful."

Shameful, perhaps, but also understandable politically.

Premier Stelmach bowed to pressure from energy companies not because he's weak but because he was unlucky.

He announced the new royalty framework in 2007 right before the 2008 economic collapse that drove down the prices of oil and gas. Adding to the government's misery, it had tied royalties on a sliding scale to the price of oil and gas.

So, not only did the province's economy suffer by the recession, the province also took in less money under the new royalty rates than under the old system. Coincidentally, drilling activity increased in Saskatchewan thanks to new technology used to exploit the old Bakken oilfield, and British Columbia introduced low royalty rates to attract investment to its gas deposits. Our neighbours seemed to be doing better than us. Natural gas prices were hammered even further by big discoveries of shale gas deposits in the United States.

It was one sucker punch after another for Stelmach, who might have withstood the pummelling if the Wildrose Alliance hadn't come along and elected as its leader the articulate, telegenic, Calgarybased and energy-industry-friendly Danielle Smith.

The latest public opinion poll shows the Conservatives and Wildrose Alliance in a virtual dead heat with the Wildrose enjoying a boost in popularity thanks to widespread anger in Calgary with Stelmach over royalties. Stelmach is betting his revised royalty rates will win Calgarians back and undermine Wildrose support.

He's also betting that those who question why he backed down on conventional oil and gas rates will realize he didn't touch the recently increased royalties on the oilsands, the largest-growing source of government revenue.

The government argues that while it might be taking in less money under its newly revised rates than under the "Our Fair Share" regime, it will still be taking a bigger cut than it took in under Ralph Klein.

Whether that's a big enough cut will be up to Albertans to decide next election (in two years?) when they'll have a better idea of the province's financial picture.

Perhaps by then they'll also figure out if the one behind the wheel is indeed Stelmach, and not the energy industry.

DiscoverWeyburn.com is Weyburn's only source for community news and information such as weather and classifieds.